A company's own finance team rarely gets the benefit of the read an auditor does. The findings exist — they are in the books — but they surface once a year, in language written for a different reader, attached to a report about something else.
The same read, in the owner's terms
Business Health runs the review a practice would run and presents it the way the person responsible for the business reads it: ranked by what each finding is costing, not by which section of which Act it falls under, and grouped into categories that make sense without having opened the Act.
A list you can actually work through
Findings are laid out as categories down one side, each stating its count and what it amounts to, before anything is opened. Pick a category and you see that category. A business with a hundred and fifty findings is a set of decisions, not a wall of text to scroll through blind.
Where the money is
The ordering is the point. A dozen small classification notes and one supplier payment that will cost a deduction are not the same thing, and a list sorted by statute puts them next to each other as equals. Sorted by cost, the expensive one is first.
Every finding carries its evidence
Each item can be opened to the entries behind it. Nothing has to be taken on trust, and nothing has to be re-derived by the finance team before it can be acted on or sent to an advisor.
It is the same engine, not a simplified version
This is not a cut-down read. It is the full set of checks a practice gets, presented differently. What a business sees here is what a reviewer would see — which is the point, because the findings are more useful before an audit than during one.
For the finance team and the advisor at once
The same findings, one list. The internal team works through what it can fix; what needs professional judgement is already documented, with its evidence attached, for whoever handles it.
Questions CAs ask
Who is Business Health for?
A company reading its own books, rather than a practice reading a client's. It presents the same findings a reviewer would see, ordered and worded for the person responsible for the business.
Is it a reduced version of what a practice gets?
No. It is the same set of checks, presented differently — ranked by what each finding costs and grouped into categories that do not assume the reader works with the Act.
Can a finding be traced back to the entries?
Yes. Every finding can be opened to the transactions behind it, so it can be acted on or passed to an advisor without being worked out again.
How are the findings ordered?
By what they amount to, so an expensive item is not listed alongside minor classification notes as an equal. Each category states its count and its total before it is opened.
Related modules
- Accounting Checks — Completeness, cut-off, accrual and classification checks run over the whole Tally books — every verdict showing its basis, every finding exportable as a working paper.
- Disallowances — Every rupee add-back in one place — 43B(h) MSME invoice by invoice with Udyam verification, 40A(3) cash, 40(a)(ia) TDS defaults, 36(1)(va) and 14A with Rule 8D.
- Fraud Detection — Forensic checks across every Tally voucher — duplicate payments, negative cash, Benford anomalies, back-dated postings — with convergence and honest gap flags.
- Ledger Analysis — Read every Tally ledger and voucher without opening a port, reconcile the read against Tally's own trial balance, and classify each ledger by its group chain.